En Kuralları Of C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız

En Kuralları Of C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız

Blog Article

You cannot predict the future. Assuming that a property's type will always be beneficial kakım a List is immediately limiting your ability to adapt to unforeseen expectations of your code.

Today, you almost always use IList, the primary reason for IList to still be around is for reasons of backwards compatibility.

If someone passes you an Array or a List, your code will work fine if you check the flag every time and have a fallback... But really; who does that?

If you think that interfaces are useful only for building over-sized, grandiose architectures and have no place in small shops, then I hope that the person sitting across from you in the interview isn't me.

Typically, a good approach is to use IList in your public facing API (when appropriate, and list semantics are needed), and then List internally to implement the API. This allows you to change to a different implementation of IList without breaking code that uses your class.

I would turn the question around a bit, instead of justifying why you should use the interface over the concrete implementation, try to justify why you would use the concrete implementation rather than the interface. If you güç't justify it, use the interface.

Bu site, istenmeyenleri azaltmak karınin Akismet kullanıyor. Yorum verilerinizin nasıl teamüllendiği üzerine henüz fazla selen edinin.

Now I am returning IList for the simple fact that I will then add this to my domain prototip what has a property like this:

Whether you return an Interface or a concrete type C# IList Nedir depends upon what you want to let your callers do with the object you created -- this is an API design decision, and there's no hard and fast rule. You have to weigh their ability to make full use of the object against their ability to easily use a portion of the objects functionality (and of course whether you WANT them C# IList Nerelerde Kullanılıyor to be making full use of the object).

tranmqtranmq 15.5k33 gold badges3232 silver badges2727 bronze badges 6 But in this case I dirilik't bind my collection to DataGridView rather I have to expose the _list member in MyCollection.

Do the decoupling capacitors act as capacitive load to the opamp which is used C# IList Kullanımı to make a virtual gorund?

Then I looked in my view(mvc) and found that I actually needed the count method bey I needed to use a for loop. So in my own application I under estimated what I actually needed how do you anticipate what someone else will need or hamiş need.

for your return types. This gives your callers the most flexibility in passing in types to your methods and the most opportunities to cast/reuse the return values.

IEnumerable allows you to iterate through a collection. ICollection builds on this and also allows for adding and removing items. IList also allows for accessing and modifying them at a specific index. By exposing the one that you expect your C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız consumer to work with, you are free to change your implementation. List happens to C# IList Kullanımı implement all three of those interfaces. If you expose your property birli a List or even an IList when all you want your consumer to have is the ability to iterate through the collection. Then they could come to depend on the fact that they yaşama modify the list.